Integrating Software Architecture Documentation into the Agile Lifecycle
Making docs as agile as your team: a guide to avoiding sprint-induced headaches
š Hi, this is Thomas, with a new issue of āBeyond Code: System Design and Moreā, where I geek out on all things system design, software architecture, distributed systems andā¦ well, more.
Integrating software architecture documentation into the agile lifecycle is crucial for maintaining alignment between the evolving system architecture and the development process.
This is has the huge advantage of ensuring that the system's design remains well-documented, adaptable, and aligned with the project's goals and requirements. However, itās not always straightforward to implement.
Here is how you can seamlessly incorporate architecture documentation into each phase of the agile lifecycle.
Initial planning and sprint 0
Goal: Create high-level architecture documentation (e.g. system diagrams, application requirements, architectural decisions records, etc. ) to guide the team in the development process.
Methods: Conduct upfront system design reviews to address key architectural concerns and ensure everyone within the team is aligned on the system's design and technology stack.
Sprint planning
Goal: Identify tasks that require updates to system architecture for upcoming sprints, to help guide the team as they implement new features and functionalities. This also helps them understanding how much architectural technical debt they are intentionally (or unintentionally) accumulating.
Methods: Document any changes in the architectural decisions, design guidelines, and constraints based on the current status of your system architecture in a single, secure location.
Sprint execution
Goal: Continuously update architecture documentation as the development progresses, capturing changes to the system's design, components, and interfaces.
Methods: Use tools like Multiplayer that automatically maintain alignment between the evolving codebase and the documented architecture. This allows developers to know the current state of the system and make better-informed decisions on how to evolve it, without having to manually update diagrams.
Continuous system design reviews also help to ensure alignment across all the stakeholders.
Sprint review
Goal: Review and validate architecture documentation to accurately reflect the implemented features and functionalities.
Methods: Gather feedback from all the stakeholders (developers, DevOps, PMs, C-suite, etc.) on the effectiveness of the architecture and identify any areas for improvement or refinement.
Sprint retrospective
Goal: Reflect on the architecture-related practices and processes, identifying successes, challenges, and opportunities for improvement.
Methods: Consider adjustments to the documentation process, tools, or methodologies based on lessons learned from previous sprints.
I originally wrote about this topic in this article:
Software Architecture Documentation: Tutorial & Best Practices
I explored these topics:
Key software architecture documentation concepts
Why is software architecture documentation important?
The impact of neglecting software architecture documentation
Different types of diagrams for reflecting software architecture
The case for dynamic diagrams
Documentation as a source of truth
Integrating software architecture documentation into the agile lifecycle
š Interesting Articles & Resources
āDelving into Architectural Driftā - Vladi Stevanovic
Architectural drift can affect any application, irrespective of its initial architectural style or the quality of its original design, thatās why understanding the root causes, consequences, and strategies for managing system architecture drift is vital.
āThings You Should Never Doā - Joel Spolsky
The single worst strategic mistake that any software company can make is to rewrite the code from scratch.
āPatterns of Legacy Displacementā - Ian Cartwright, Rob Horn, and James Lewis
A series of patterns that allows organizations to break the cycle of half-completed technology replacements.